Slowly I feel really ignored.
My requests and problems are never answered and here you discuss things that make no sense at all or have already been chewed over 20 times.
@DaveBinM
Where exactly did you state that it is a bad idea for the server admin to make the settings for the users? Didn’t find the post and am very interested to read the answer. For me this statement makes no sense as it was said here now.
Only the server admin really knows his users and not a programmer somewhere in the world.
@ChuckPa
Again, your statement makes 0 sense. Why should my settings, which I want to set for the respective user, affect another server?
I don’t want to adjust any local settings which are then valid globally, then the server admins would hinder each other. But I want to set which settings apply when the respective user wants to play something on my server, period!
It can definitely not be so difficult to set that the client depending on the server he accesses the settings according to the default of the server admin and then plays. This can be compared to user policies on a Windows or Linux server where people access remotely from outside. There you can also set everything possible per user before and when connecting these guidelines are then set for this user.
Moreover, this scenario with multiple servers probably applies to only 1% of all users, if at all. Of my 60+ users, each has only my server and 60% of them are already overwhelmed by having to make only 4 changes in the settings to the bad default settings that are currently set.
So the problem is really acute in my eyes and here they talk about a super solution that should solve all the problems. But I seriously wonder how this is possible. It can only be some kind of auto function that measures the connection and then supposedly sets it perfectly. The only question is whether this does not lead to more problems. I have my doubts, because there are always connections that fluctuate extremely, just the whole P2MP connections which are then often overbooked in the evening, that would mean that he constantly changes the resolutions which in my eyes and for my understanding leads to even more transcoding.
I know from all my users, every device they use, every ISP and every speed. So I know exactly what I have to set for whom. I also don’t see the problem with mobile devices. They come over cellular IP’s and for that you could set different quality settings and agree that with the user if they have GB limitation. But just as an example. This is also almost non-existent in Switzerland. 99 have an unlimited offer. So even there you would not have to pay much attention to the data consumption. Therefore I say yes. It is so individual that simply the server admin must set. He knows his users to 95% sure personally and knows what is best for you and him, or his server.
I effectively have the feeling on the Plex side that server admins have no idea what they are doing and therefore want to control or automate everything. Only I’m sure that 99% of all server admins who share their servers with friends know exactly what to do if they were just given the settings options. I just don’t understand the problem. Bring your super automated new feature for all I care. But let the admins who know what you are doing keep control. Because currently I don’t feel in the role of an admin, as I can actually only control when I record and what I offer, but not what the particular user sets, that’s a disaster. I can’t control what the users do, I’ve had days where 30 people transcoded and the server crashed. Although everything was set at the beginning, but as already mentioned several times, Plex has the disease to reset everything again and again and then the admin is simply powerless. Respectively, he must then write all individual again because of the settings and again many are not professionals. This is not done in 2-3 minutes for many. So actually one server admin is always exploited and punished. With the only correct solution I would have to set everything once and then I would have peace. Takes maybe then per user a few minutes, but then only once or maybe every few years again what if he changes the ISP or gets faster speed. No more. For me the case is clear, only here some seem to think too far and forget what would be possible with policies on server queries and that can definitely not be a difficult thing to implement because this has nowadays every Windows and Linux device and you can always control everything as an admin if you want and that’s what it’s all about in my opinion. I want it that way so I set it fix. Will I not bother come your default settings or your new oh so wonderful new solution about the 0 information. But again in my eyes this solution can’t possibly be as good and resource saving as if the admin could set it. We are not that far with AI and any routines yet.