An article came out today (1/9/2019) that is being shared and creating a lot of commotion among the Plex communities on Facebook. I don’t know if the “powers that be” at Plex will see what I type here, but maybe if this community has a lot to say in response to this, then maybe it will get seen or make a difference.
First, here is the link to the article by PC Magazine:
Next, a quote from the article for those that don’t want to click the above link:
“That means premium or ad-supported content will show up next to a users’ own media files, although whether or not that will drive consumers to purchase or watch it remains to be seen.”
Here are my thoughts…
I don’t think it should show up along side my own media, it should be separate like how Tidal is separate from my music collection. For example, Tidal is currently in the “Online Content” section of Plex when viewing in Chrome. So I think in that same section it should say “Premium Video”. By having the link says “Premium Video”, that gives Plex the possibility to have in that section ad-based, rent based, or subscription based Movies and TV shows.
Another thought, my six year old son has his own managed user where I give him access only to certain libraries and rating based content. This is great! I love this current Plex feature because I know that my six year old son won’t accidentally (or purposely) start watching The Belko Experiment; but if premium (paid) content will show up along side my current media… What stops whatever algorithm Plex will use to show premium content along my media from showing my son premium content that I do not want him watching? What if I don’t want my son to click on any premium content?
Again, this all goes back to having Premium Video in it’s own section, separate from my own media collection.
On top of this, there should be a new restriction added for user management (at least for managed/home users) to allow or not allow Premium Video. Unless this new Premium Video would fall under the current “Allow Plugins” checkbox. I noticed that for my sons account (a managed/home user) that since I do not allow him plugins, that Tidal does not show up. At least I know he won’t go on Tidal and listen to music that I don’t want him to hear yet.
So, this concludes my rant/suggestion. Maybe I read the article different from everyone else or maybe PC Mag quoted Scott Olechowski incorrectly.
Thoughts?