@Xhaka said:
I’m just curious… Why do you feel its common sense to manually sort through a couple of thousand movies to implement what is a very basic feature of every other mainstream media centre/server software?
I think everyone can agree that Plex is always a work-around in progress to some degree. 1000s of movies in a library is crazy-medicine when you have to deal with two horizontal rows that run from my house to the Moon. Plex is so proud of those two horizontal rows of tiny posters they don’t care how many thousands of users hate them. That’s what we have and that’s all we’ll have. ■■■■■ about it and move on. The ‘work-around’ for that shortcoming is to have smaller libraries and more of them so setting up a library for my Sci-Fi Sets was a no-brainer and navigating the 107 Movies in my Sci-Fi Sets library is pretty easy.
@JuiceWSA said:
I’m about ready to add that next HDD and when that happens another library - ‘1980 - 2000 Sets’ will be created and investigations conclude it will contain about 120 items to start, opening the door for the next ‘Sets’ Library (2001 - 2020 Sets) at some point - and if I live that long.
Hey, it’s up to me to work around that which Plex clearly couldn’t give a chubby rat’s bee-hind about and considering people have been whining about this ‘Boxed Sets’ issue for 10 years resulting in ‘Crickets’ it’s on me to find some work around that works and mine is working out fine.
I think it’s probably time for others to come to that same conclusion and start inventing a work around that works for them instead of curling up in a ball and weeping about something Plex CLEARLY is unwilling - or unable - to do anything about.
Just do like I do and ■■■■■ about it whenever necessary, but also work on a work-around you can live with 'cause it’s likely never going to change, but if it ever does, and if History is any indication of what would likely happen if it does, Plex wouldn’t ask for user input, or ignore it (the aforementioned Dueling Banjos Horizontal Hell - users told them it would suck and guess what - it sucks), developing a much more horrific method than the work around we’re using now.
Be careful what you wish for - you might get it.
![]()
