Same issue in beta , I would say longer
I dropped my Contact an email .
he is on Leave but he will poke the dev’s when he gets back.
Thanks VERY much … that would be great!
do you or your contact know if there is any increased USB 3.0 device support? I have an open one with them I would actually like to get USB 3 throughput with… 
Vantec 6G eSATA/USB 3.0 support not yet included in DSM 6.0.2.
Problem Reproduce Steps: [ 113.695737] ata6: EH complete
[ 118.602840] iSCSI:target_core_rodsp_server.c:954 RODSPS Start-[00113235b74f]
[ 118.619196] iSCSI:extent_pool.c:619 INIT Extent-Pool
[ 118.639323] iSCSI:target_core_device.c:577 Rounding down aligned max_sectors from 4294967295 to 4294967288
[ 118.650369] iSCSI:target_core_lunbackup.c:401 512 buffers allocated, total 2097152 bytes successfully
[ 118.748624] iSCSI:target_core_ep.c:864 RODSP plugin is enabled.
[ 118.755263] iSCSI:target_core_ep.c:871 ODX Token Manager is enabled.
[ 242.674041] init: pkgctl-WebTools pre-start process (17291) terminated with status 1
[ 246.428336] type=1400 audit(1471843525.555:2): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" parent=17562 profile="/volume*/@appstore/DownloadStation/sbin/scheduler" name="/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-root/lib/libm-2.17.so" pid=17581 comm="synodldbrpcd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=125560 ouid=0
[ 604.049625] ata10: device plugged sstatus 0x1
[ 604.054528] ata10: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0xe frozen
[ 604.062323] ata10: irq_stat 0x00a00080, device exchanged
[ 604.068276] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 604.072465] ata10: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5Gbps and disable IPM
[ 614.077809] ata10: softreset failed (timeout)
[ 614.082688] ata10: softreset failed, set srst fail flag
[ 614.088535] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 624.104924] ata10: softreset failed (timeout)
[ 624.109803] ata10: softreset failed, set srst fail flag
[ 624.115651] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 626.253670] ata10: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
[ 626.260692] ata10: link reset sucessfully clear error flags
[ 627.268270] ata10.15: Port Multiplier 1.2, 0x197b:0x0562 r0, 1 ports, feat 0x5/0xf
[ 627.277770] ata10: Apply Synology fast PMP boot
[ 628.293353] ata10.00: failed to resume link (SControl 0)
[ 630.301145] ata10.00: hard resetting link
[ 631.317765] ata10.00: failed to resume link (SControl 0)
[ 631.324199] ata10.00: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0)
[ 631.330777] WARNING: disk 10 can't find master
[ 631.335741] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 631.340903] WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-eh.c:1439 ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x14c0/0x1740()
[ 631.350725] Modules linked in: iscsi_target_mod(O) target_core_ep(O) target_core_file(O) target_core_iblock(O) target_core_mod(O) syno_extent_pool(PO) rodsp_ep(O) cifs udf isofs loop nfsd exportfs rpcsec_gss_krb5 hid_generic usbhid hid usblp usb_storage xt_mac xt_geoip(O) compat_xtables(O) nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables xt_recent xt_iprange xt_limit xt_state xt_tcpudp xt_multiport xt_LOG nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables bonding avoton_synobios(PO) leds_lp3943 btrfs synoacl_vfs(PO) zlib_deflate hfsplus md4 hmac libcrc32c compat(O) igb(O) i2c_algo_bit e1000e(O) fuse vfat fat crc32c_intel aesni_intel glue_helper lrw gf128mul ablk_helper arc4 cryptd ecryptfs sha512_generic sha256_generic sha1_generic ecb aes_x86_64 authenc des_generic
[ 631.430687] ansi_cprng cts md5 cbc cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_performance acpi_cpufreq mperf processor thermal_sys cpufreq_stats freq_table dm_snapshot crc_itu_t crc_ccitt quota_v2 quota_tree psnap p8022 llc sit tunnel4 ip_tunnel ipv6 sg etxhci_hcd xhci_hcd uhci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd usbcore usb_common [last unloaded: avoton_synobios]
[ 631.462539] CPU: 0 PID: 3513 Comm: scsi_eh_9 Tainted: P O 3.10.77 #8451
[ 631.470904] Hardware name: Insyde MohonPeak/Type2 - Board Product Name1, BIOS M.110 2014/12/23
[ 631.480524] ffffffff8149d52e ffffffff81033bc8 ffff880274ab4000 0000000000000000
[ 631.488809] 0000000000000246 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff813458a0
[ 631.497095] ffff880274ab70e0 0000000174ab4000 0000000100000000 ffff880270cd0000
[ 631.505380] Call Trace:
[ 631.508113] [<ffffffff8149d52e>] ? dump_stack+0xc/0x15
[ 631.513953] [<ffffffff81033bc8>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x58/0x70
[ 631.520862] [<ffffffff813458a0>] ? ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x14c0/0x1740
[ 631.528841] [<ffffffff81345bac>] ? ata_scsi_error+0x8c/0xc0
[ 631.535167] [<ffffffff81315ea4>] ? scsi_error_handler+0xc4/0x480
[ 631.541979] [<ffffffff81315de0>] ? scsi_eh_get_sense+0x100/0x100
[ 631.548792] [<ffffffff81053882>] ? kthread+0xb2/0xc0
[ 631.554437] [<ffffffff810537d0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
[ 631.561734] [<ffffffff814a3408>] ? ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[ 631.567963] [<ffffffff810537d0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
[ 631.575258] ---[ end trace 1ee50420afe34fa2 ]---
[ 631.580420] ata10: EH complete
admin@moesern:~$all I can see is about 10 to 30 MB increase in Network.
I will look at later, I did see some work being done on the USB ( no comment I haven’t used or tested it) .
Thank you. Greatly appreciated.
So after many emails back and forth with Netgear they are adamant that the GS108Tv2 doesn’t support true IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation. They insist I need a Layer 3 and Layer 4 Lag config to be able to upload from one NAS drive to more then one PC at speeds faster then 1Gbps…
Have a look at the sanitized thread for the whole conversation, I’m at a loss for words at this point.
I have two words for their reply which are quite easily abbreviated as B.S.
They have a problem and won’t acknowledge it nor fix it. All that, pardon my French, Clown wants to push is a business-class product sale.
Linksys here we come.
I think so as well, filed a complaint, not that much will happen with it.
When their revenue falls. Something will happen. lol
Please post back with what you find. I’m starting my inquiry and C.S. messaging for recommendations as well
"We (several potential customers) need to replace junk LACP switches from another vendor. Can you help us with with consumer-grade, fully functional (2000/3000/4000 Mbps) solution selection for use with Synology and QNAP NAS products ?
I’ve spent some time on the phone with the other two key vendors. Every question I fired at them yielded the correct answer without hesitation. +points.
8 and 16 port variants available +points
Key point to take into consideration: Small business Tech Support folks. Not consumer / domestic market.
Question:
Interpretation of 802.3ad dynamic aggregation in an ‘up’ LAG … Presenting the test where two hosts, each capable of 900+ Mbps individually only see 450 Mbps when both operating simultaneously.
Reply:
“That’s not what the standard says” +points
Research: Pricing of 8 + 16 port product (MSRP). Much better than I expected and well within what I’d be willing to pay.
One vendor has an 18 port variant. Primary 16 + 2 for upllink/downling / configuration (your decision) with expansion slots for fiber.
Thoughts?
Sounds promising, do they have a vendor in Canada? What are we looking at for the 16 port?
Strictly ‘me’ speaking here…
I ordered the LGS308. While not fond of the idea, WiFi and DSL traffic on one Netgear, heavy-hitter on the LGS.
The LGS318 is the 16 port version with 2 uplink/management extra ports. It also has room for option cards
To followup on something from my discussions with my selected choice.
@6729g@to said:
So after many emails back and forth with Netgear they are adamant that the GS108Tv2 doesn’t support true IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation. They insist I need a Layer 3 and Layer 4 Lag config to be able to upload from one NAS drive to more then one PC at speeds faster then 1Gbps…
Have a look at the sanitized thread for the whole conversation, I’m at a loss for words at this point.
<soapbox>
I’ll just share one last thought about their stuff (yes, i’m still laughing at it). LACP is a Layer 2 function. Netgear is a Layer 2 switch (which is where VLANS go, along with any other switching and every switch does), so why can’t it do what any other ‘smart switch’ does and obey the standard they stick on the box.
</soapbox>
=))
@ChuckPa said:
Strictly ‘me’ speaking here…I ordered the LGS308. While not fond of the idea, WiFi and DSL traffic on one Netgear, heavy-hitter on the LGS.
The LGS318 is the 16 port version with 2 uplink/management extra ports. It also has room for option cards
Hmmm, $210 CND through Amazon prime. Probably still won’t resolve NAS link aggregation issue, wonder if I still have time to return this netgear… thanks for the info Chuck!
I grilled the Linksys guys. They were the ones who said “That’s not what the spec says”.
I found purchasing the Linksys from them directly was cheaper.
IFF it doesn’t work now, it is synology and they can’t hide. Right now, with Netgear in the picture, they can.
My switch will arrive Wednesday. I will test ASAP
Hey,
don´t know if you both know that “TP-Link TL-SG2008 Netzwerk Switch (RJ45 8-port)” Switch. I ordert it today and want to do also 2gb\s LAPC .
Maybe you both try this switch?!
Hope I can help with it and didn´t get the thread wrong
Specs:
IEEE802.3i
IEEE802.3u
IEEE802.3ab
IEEE802.3ad
IEEE802.3x
IEEE802.1d
IEEE802.1s
IEEE802.1w
IEEE802.1q
IEEE802.1p
I didn’t have time to talk to them about their products.
Please do let us know what your findings are.
I think it’s going to be in our combined best interest to have a 'Power Users List of Toys" for Synology and PMS.
Just noticed this thread, I am on DSM 6.0.2-8451 Update 8 and get around 250MB/s using Link Aggregation. I’m running 2 Synology DS1815+ units connected to HP Procurve 1800‑24G Switch with the Synology units on 2 separate port keys. Not sure if I can be of much help other than saying it certainly seems to work fine for me? Anything in particular I could check or test?
Thanks for the post Codeecb, let’s see if Chuck and Streamerx are able to get it working, it might be a netgear issue after all?
Theoretically, since the Synology ports are MDI/MDI-X auto detecting, running a pair of patch cables between the two and setting both up for LACP should latch right up. At that point, the only limit should be what the HDs can deliver and the writing system can encode onto the RAID set.
It will be interesting if this turns out to be a Netgear. Thanks @codeecb for your info. We’ve got a nice equipment list building!
no i See the Issue on my Cisco 300 series . have they address a fix in update 8 ? .
Broken in RC 6.1 hmm must have been quick adding patch . it was still broken last week in RC.
