Bulk/mass labeling was implemented, however, it does not make it easy to restrict a handful of movies from specific users.
Use case: Family sharing, there are some specific R rated movies, not all, but some specific ones that I dont want family users seeing, I'd mark those as "restrict" and only I should will see them in my library.
In order to accomplish the above currently, I'd have to label everything BUT those movies as "family friendly" and share that label with users.This method sucks. :) going forward Id have to label all new non restricted movies, etc. etc.
In order to accomplish the above currently, I'd have to label everything BUT those movies as "family friendly" and share that label with users.This method sucks. :) going forward Id have to label all new non restricted movies, etc. etc.
Another way to accomplish this is to change the rating of the questionable "R rated" films to a different rating (NC-17, R+) and do not share those rated films with the family.
Another way to accomplish this is to change the rating of the questionable "R rated" films to a different rating (NC-17, R+) and do not share those rated films with the family.
Yeah but this is just as inconvenient. There simply needs to be exclude filters on the sharing setup.
Another way to accomplish this is to change the rating of the questionable "R rated" films to a different rating (NC-17, R+) and do not share those rated films with the family.
An OK workaround, but not clean, thanks for the heads up though.
Do you think this feature is something not worth implementing because of this workaround? Thoughts?
While I agree that it's more development ... I think it's a valuable and likely trivial feature. Workarounds are just that ... workarounds. Mass select and de-select specifics works of course, but it isn't logically the same as a exclude button.
While I agree that it's more development ... I think it's a valuable and likely trivial feature. Workarounds are just that ... workarounds. Mass select and de-select specifics works of course, but it isn't logically the same as a exclude button.
agreed. the logic is probably already there, just need to tweak it a bit, lol im no dev :(