@Rycochet said:
Feel free to PM me if you want to dive into this deeper …
Happy to - but public conversations get more feedback from other people 
Public is fine, that is what the community is meant for. Though often you can cut through the grease more expediently in a small group setting. I’m happy discussing in the place users prefer.
@Rycochet said:
Maybe combining them - if on the Beta track of releases have an extra specific “Beta Blog” section similar to Announcements. Include the Release Notes as new entries (so you can forget to read before updating and still find them quickly), and also actual blog style updates when things are relevant - with links to the relevant forum posts on here so people can give feedback in one place (and it doesn’t turn into a 10+ new threads all complaining about the same thing) - which also reinforces the whole “beta test” part of things.
I love this idea! I can’t make any promises but I think this would be really helpful in the ways you described. I’ll take this to my team for discussion.
I think that part of what makes people like Plex Pass is getting things early - so my own view would be Beta, Plex Pass, and Public - Beta can have new features (such as News) and bug fixes. That then gets promoted to Plex Pass after a week provided that there’s only been Patch changes (semver style), or there hasn’t been a large discussion such as this one. I’d expect a large proportion of people on here would be happy to stick to this style of “Plex Pass” release, would feel special for it (we did pay after all), and wouldn’t get the sort of issues that caused this.
(Just reminds me of the Futurama “Executive” sketch
)
Then you’d get people like me and a small proportion who want to be on the newest fixes (they’ve often been very relevant and bugs make things unusable at times) and are quite happy to give feedback (in a far more sensible and polite manner when not surprised like that lol) so would like to be on a full “Beta” track. I’d also suggest putting an announcement in the WebApp asking for feedback when new things come out (same style as the “new server version available” announcement) - a short 5 minute survey type thing, but with enough info both in it and in the related blog post etc that says “can you look at this”.
Promoted to Executive Delivery Boy!
Great ideas, I will pass them along as I think this relates well to discussions we’re having.
Short of giving partial read-only access to the internal bug tracker for transparency, there’s not much else that can be done - until bug XYZ is fixed you’ll get people talking about the same thing again and again 
We’ve talked about public bug tracker visibility and it really is a slippery slope. I’ll be honest with you, I wouldn’t expect it soon because it’s something thats could easily become a garage pit for reports. We could get really high quality, well reproduced and documented issues from some users, while also getting low quality reports with inadequate information, misunderstanding or disagreement of feature intension, edge cases, etc – that could potentially slow down the production and QA process. I wouldn’t say never, but it’s not a high priority. What we are working on is a new bug reporting and triage model for Plex Ninjas to use. Ninjas are all over the forums and they are in very close communication with us in our internal chat channels. They dogfood alpha releases and have access to specific GitHub repos for filing issues. We think that’s a more sustainable first approach at it. Actually, Ninjas already can do most of that, just now we are doing a more structured, streamlined process for triaging that involves them being more closely involved with a POC in engineering on the given issue. It’s sustainable because the volume of reports will be less, more focused, and better prepared (overall) – even though much of the data points will still be coming from the forums.
@JamminR said:
My current soap box - with a few noted questions. I grow weary of the ‘power-user’ “defense” I’ve seen used over the past few months from several of the Plex employees and even Ninjas. That is, that we’re only ~5% of the Plex user base, and that we should remember the rest of the world. By no means am I saying forget the rest of the world, I’m simply saying; stop counting us out.
Please allow me to clarify my writing. My intention of that statement was to bring perspective, not trying to be defensive though I can see how it is viewed like that. I want to reaffirm that we value the forum community immensely because you guys are our biggest critics and in some cases biggest fans. We get unfiltered feedback and reflections for this part of the user base. It is absolutely invaluable, and while we haven’t been able to meet the needs of every power user (either due to business, direction, prioritization, etc, reasons), we do strive to get as much of your feedback into the product as possible to make Plex better. It’s no surprise that the bugs raised in the forum can and do help the rest of the community who does not participate in the forums.
My only intension in that statement is to say that we do have to balance the needs of various user types and use cases, but have no intention of ignoring either one. For that, I apologize if it feels that way. We simply cannot only focus on meeting the suggestions provided by one group of users. It is a delicate balancing act. We’ve renewed our efforts in the forum to focus on helping users with issues, alerting engineers, and communicating micro-updates. I think some of the advice provided in this thread will help us take that a step further.
@JamminR said:
Whenever some new (policy/feature/change) is (added/removed/changed) out of (seemingly as late) nowhere that is commonly disliked, I keep seeing new forum members post in droves. Many having less than 10-15 posts when I first see them. I also find that some of the regulars I used to converse with grow quiet, and/or like me, grow cynical and somewhat wary.
My own thoughts on that are that there’s been a lot of change recently to the Plex ecosystem, or so it seems. We have many dedicated users that have been here since the beginning (Mac fork of XMBC days) or soon after. Plex may be going in a different direction than they as users envisioned and would want to see for the company. But it is a company and the goals don’t always align. Some things need to happen to support growth or the addition of new functionality, such as updating the privacy policy. I can understand the difficulty that can come from watching something evolve in a different way that I had hoped. Even though Plex is venturing into some new areas to help users get more legal content into the ecosystem, we’re not moving away from the bread-and-butter local PMS model. It may just be part of the media-focused ecosystem, not the whole thing.
@JamminR said:
Is Plex counting the many people there that don’t have accounts here, or vice versa, in your ‘feature’ focus groups?
Are there focus groups for your features/additions? It’s sure not PlexPass users. We get to try new things, but by the time any of us post like/dislike/suggestions, it’s often already in a full release seemingly half-baked (the news feature being one).
I don’t directly work with focus groups, but my understanding of it is we do involve users inside and outside the forum. Some if it is done through invitation-based NDA-driven alpha testing, others involve usage studies. I am aware that there is interest to expand this.
@JamminR said:
Lately, we’ve lost the feeling that anyone is listening regarding the beta versions.
I can see how some might feel this way, I just hope its not the majority as we have done some things recently to provide more interaction and communication to beta users in the forums. Clearly we have more to work on 
@Rycochet said:
Just realised this thread has been hijacked… Maybe that’s a good thing lol
It’s clear we have exhausted the purpose of this thread. Anyone is free to open a new thread to continue any part of this discussion you are interested in, just please @-mention me so I get notified. As long as we keep the discussion constructive, I’m happy to be involved. I work closely with a lot of teams. If I don’t already know the answer, or understand it well enough to elaborate, I can find out 